Wednesday, September 7, 2022

Parental Consent is Insufficient for Transgender Edification and Medical Procedures. The Age of Consent Must Be 21 By The Subject Itself Under a Psychiatric Protocol Without Public School Indoctrination

By David William Jedell September 19, 2022 Follow the money: So-called medical "experts" are mutilating gender-confused people because it's profitable https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/fairness-justice/follow-the-money-medical-experts-are-mutilating-gender-confused-people-because-its-profitable Oklahoma governor signs bill withholding hospital funding over trans youth care https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/oklahoma-governor-signs-bill-withholding-hospital-funding-trans-youth-rcna50804 Ohio parents concerned by teacher badges linking to sexually explicit material https://www.foxnews.com/media/ohio-parents-concerned-teacher-badges-linking-sexually-explicit-material Jean Piaget the Foremost Renown Pioneering Psychologist on the Stages of Child Development - Video of Him and also Child Subjects from Ages 3-1/2 to 12. If you view these tapes you will see the slow development of a child’s mental capabilities and couldn’t possibly expect them to understand transgenderism or even the sensation of sexual intercourse. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=I1JWr4G8YLM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Qb4TPj1pxzQ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x9nSC_Xgabc https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cVSaEHhOEZY Erik Erikson’s 8 Lifetime Stages of Psycho-Social Development. Erikson is a world renown pioneering psychologist. You will see how the recent subversive public education system is manipulating these natural stages that normally get resolved on their own in time in the absence of transgender indoctrination and psychosocial sexual identity subversion. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aYCBdZLCDBQ These psychosocial sexual shemes pervert te natural stages of development when indoctrination interferes with progression of these stages. The stages must be gone through in sequential order. You can't skip a stage, but must come to a temporary or final establishment of the completion of the stage however long it takes. Thus sexual abuse in the form of indoctrination by ANYONE must become a criminal offense with severe prison terms, loss of medical or other professional license, as applied to exposing this gender dysphoria upon children under 18. The mind of a child developes very slowly. They literally are not capable of knowledge of what transgenderism means or the irreversibly mental and physical damage that will be done. The known developmental stages are manipulated by the Propaganda Complex, public education and peer pressure to conform to the collective. Parental consent is irrelevant. It must become illegal to indoctrinate children under 18, despite parental consent. Can a parent consent to their child's underage drinking? Can a parent consent to having the local drug dealer provide their child with heroin? Can a parent consent to their child engainging prostitution or participating in child pornography? Can a parent consent to their 12 year old daughter to have her clitoris removed to marry a foreign religeous fanatic? Parents are completely unqualified to accept the destruction of their child on behalf of the child. It is the child who will suffer the irreversible brain and physical damage. Many of these children grow up to commit suicide. It's the child's life not the parents. Many parents don't love their children, are drug addicts, abort their children, have children by mistake, abuse their children, etc., etc. If you accepted parental consent, if they refuse they will be cancelled and ostracised. Thus they will be coerced by social and economic collectivist pressures. Further, when the child grows up and regrets the damage done to them they will be able to sue their parents. E.G., Pennsylvania school district accused of banning Girls Who Code book series https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/26/pennsylvania-book-ban-girls-who-code?CMP=oth_b-aplnews_d-1 Once the child turns 18, and not before, they must be required to receive 3 years of psychiatric therapy once per month if they personally wish to transgender. Thus as a free country ought to (and I'm not sure of this) it must allow a mentally capable, uncoerced adult of 21 years or older to proceed with a program sworn under oath and recommeded by a psychiatrist to be the least worse alternaive. Any media or entertainment company must be criminally prosecuted if they expose gender dysphoria to children under 18 and be subject to criminal indictment and permanent loss of corporate charter. I have no quarrel with the LGBT segment of the population being free to conduct their sexual activities, in accordance with the laws protecting minors and coercive practices. When it comes to children, Piaget and Erikson would roll over in their graves over the current state of affairs and would never agree to such mental and physical interference with human stages of development. Gays Against Grooming are against this too. https://www.gaysagainstgroomers.com/about Don't bother researching this. You will only find corrupted internet articles that claim informed consent of the child or the parent is sufficient for “gender affirming care.” This is the destructive subversion of America right before your eyes. Here is an example of a 25 year old biological female who "transitioned" at 15 years old and her life now is about regret and the harm doneto her and to children: https://www.foxnews.com/media/woman-detransitioned-sounds-alarm-dangerous-surgeries-allowed-minors Schools cited for child pornography https://www.christianpost.com/news/mayor-to-school-board-resign-over-child-porn-taught-in-school.html Citizen's Guide To U.S. Federal Law On Child Pornography 18 U.S.C. § 2251- Sexual Exploitation of Children (Production of child pornography) 18 U.S.C. § 2251A- Selling and Buying of Children 18 U.S.C. § 2252- Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors (Possession, distribution and receipt of child pornography) 18 U.S.C. § 2252A- certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography 18 U.S.C. § 2256- Definitions 18 U.S.C. § 2260- Production of sexually explicit depictions of a minor for importation into the United States Images of child pornography are not protected under First Amendment rights, and are illegal contraband under federal law. Section 2256 of Title 18, United States Code, defines child pornography as any visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a minor (someone under 18 years of age). Visual depictions include photographs, videos, digital or computer generated images indistinguishable from an actual minor, and images created, adapted, or modified, but appear to depict an identifiable, actual minor. Undeveloped film, undeveloped videotape, and electronically stored data that can be converted into a visual image of child pornography are also deemed illegal visual depictions under federal law. Notably, the legal definition of sexually explicit conduct does not require that an image depict a child engaging in sexual activity. A picture of a naked child may constitute illegal child pornography if it is sufficiently sexually suggestive. Additionally, the age of consent for sexual activity in a given state is irrelevant; any depiction of a minor under 18 years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct is illegal. Federal law prohibits the production, distribution, reception, and possession of an image of child pornography using or affecting any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce (See 18 U.S.C. § 2251; 18 U.S.C. § 2252; 18 U.S.C. § 2252A). Specifically, Section 2251 makes it illegal to persuade, induce, entice, or coerce a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for purposes of producing visual depictions of that conduct. Any individual who attempts or conspires to commit a child pornography offense is also subject to prosecution under federal law. Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child pornography offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child pornography across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child pornography violation. Even if the child pornography image itself did not travel across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD-ROM used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce. In addition, Section 2251A of Title 18, United States Code, specifically prohibits any parent, legal guardian or other person in custody or control of a minor under the age of 18, to buy, sell, or transfer custody of that minor for purposes of producing child pornography. Lastly, Section 2260 of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits any persons outside of the United States to knowingly produce, receive, transport, ship, or distribute child pornography with intent to import or transmit the visual depiction into the United States. Any violation of federal child pornography law is a serious crime, and convicted offenders face severe statutory penalties. For example, a first time offender convicted of producing child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2251, face fines and a statutory minimum of 15 years to 30 years maximum in prison. A first time offender convicted of transporting child pornography in interstate or foreign commerce under 18 U.S.C. § 2252, faces fines and a statutory minimum of 5 years to 20 years maximum in prison. Convicted offenders may face harsher penalties if the offender has prior convictions or if the child pornography offense occurred in aggravated situations defined as (i) the images are violent, sadistic, or masochistic in nature, (ii) the minor was sexually abused, or (iii) the offender has prior convictions for child sexual exploitation. In these circumstances, a convicted offender may face up to life imprisonment. It is important to note that an offender can be prosecuted under state child pornography laws in addition to, or instead of, federal law. Updated May 28, 2020 https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography Obscenity in Schools https://www.parentsrightsined.org/obscenity-in-schools.html Virginia (and other stats) has moved to restrict the rights of trans students in its public schools------------------ https://apple.news/AxGYJY65wQNefkCNLAnJyWQ Dr. Quentin Van Meter testimony to Pennsylvania Legislature against transgender child abuse https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/TR/Transcripts/2020_0046_0002_TSTMNY.pdf High suicide rate according to NIH among those who transitioned https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28031583/ Amicus brief to SCOTUS with Dr. Quentin https://www.lifesn Meter and other doctors "Amici agree with the American College of Pediatricians’ conclusion that conditioning children into believing that a lifetime of impersonating someone of the opposite sex, achievable only through chemical and surgical interventions, is harmful to youths." https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/doe_v_boyertown_area_school_district_-_amicus_brief_of_dr._miriam_grossman_et_al. President of American College of Pediatricians slams transgender drugs as ‘child abuse’ Dr. Quentin Van Meter, president of the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds), slammed the use of puberty blockers for children with gender dysphoria, describing the practice as “child abuse.” In an exclusive interview with LifeSiteNews, Dr. Van Meter, a Johns Hopkins-trained pediatrician and pediatric endocrinologist, reiterated ACPeds’ position that prescribing hormone blockers for gender dysphoria violates medical ethics and said it should be criminalized. “We said in our policy statement that it is child abuse for all intents and purposes,” he said, “and that it is taking a very healthy, intentionally designed part of life where a child goes from being a non-reproductive individual to becoming a reproductive individual in a time frame and an age frame where the physiology is there to change the physical body in terms of bone structure, in terms of organ structure, in terms of brain maturation.” “If you are interrupting that with clearly the intent of never having it go the direction that nature intended, with biological males ending up as adult males and biological females ending up as adult female, if you interrupt that, you are basically setting up a disease state,” Van Meter continued. “And then on top of that, the purpose is clearly in the vast majority of kids that get on puberty blockers, they will not be allowed to go through their own natural puberty. They will be held back and then given cross-sex hormones.” “So it’s a conveyor belt. And once that patient is placed on the conveyor belt of puberty blockers, they are carried down the assembly line to cross-sex hormones. And then at the end, have an option to do surgery to mutilate their bodies to appear like the opposite sex.” “I think the steps that have been proposed in terms of making this an offense and considering it to be medically unethical should be pressed to the max,” Van Meter said. “It should be looked at in terms of licensure of physicians who do this.” Though federal regulators have never approved any medication for gender dysphoria, dozens of gender clinics around the country have started prescribing hormone blockers to children off-label in recent years to halt their puberty and affirm their so-called “transgender identities.” Planned Parenthood has moved into the puberty blocker business as well, as have major health systems, like Kaiser Permanente and the Mayo Clinic, regardless of the fact that the drugs are linked to a host of serious, permanent side effects. One of the most commonly prescribed puberty blockers, Lupron, can lead to “osteoporosis, mood disorders, seizures, cognitive impairment and, when combined with cross-sex hormones, sterility,” according to ACPeds. Another one, Vantas, is associated with osteoporosis, kidney damage, and liver problems, among other things. Hormone blockers also frequently lead to emotional issues – reported in upwards of 20 percent of users – that can ultimately leave patients unmanageable, Dr. Van Meter told LifeSite. Psychiatric side effects have been reported for years in adults treated with the drugs according to their FDA-approved purposes, like prostrate cancer, and in children treated for precocious puberty. “So, we know many side effects are there. The long-term side effects are known in adults,” Van Meter said. “They are not known at all in adolescents, because there has been no long-term study to look at this.” “In the adolescent, there is no data that has ever been gathered over a period of 10, 15, or 20 years. They are guessing and hoping. This is one large experiment on American children.” Proponents of the dangerous, experimental drugs often claim, without evidence, that gender-confused children will commit suicide if refused puberty blockers, Van Meter said. “But what we do know from pouring over data is that all of these children have severe emotional problems going in, and they’re not because they are gender dysphoric and caused by societal rejection.” “They have deep emotional problems, which is why the world is now turning around and saying, those are what you evaluate, those are what you treat, leave the gender dysphoria on the sidelines and it will resolve with time, as it does in 80 to 90 percent of children who get the chance to have that kind of counseling and evaluation.” Virtually all gender-confused kids given puberty blockers end up on cross-sex hormones, which often result in sterilization and typically lead to mutilating transgender surgeries. At the same time, up to nearly 100 percent of boys and 90 percent of girls with gender dysphoria naturally come to accept their biological sex by adulthood, according to the most recent edition of the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. “And the organizations such as the Endocrine Society, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the World Professional Association of Transgender Health, their treatment guidelines should be viewed exactly what they are: the viewpoint of a small group of individuals who are all like-minded and have never, ever considered and never brought in and presented the broad spectrum of people who treat kids with gender dysphoria,” he said. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/president-of-american-college-of-pediatricians-blasts-trans-drugs-for-kids-as-child-abuse/ Interview with Dr. Quentin Van Meter https://thenewamerican.com/transgender-quackery-exposed-as-child-abuse-by-top-doctor/ Akron Children’s Hospital opens Center for Gender Affirming Medicine and has treated pre-pubescent patients who have identified as transgender from a young age. The patient and their parents may ask for “hormone blockers,” or pubertal suppression, so they have a few more years to explore their identity and don’t have to go through potentially troublesome physical changes - treatment for patients as young as 7 years old. https://cleveland.com/medical/2019/07/akron-childrens-hospital-opens-center-for-gender-affirming-medicine.html The Propaganda Complex world for teens is mind control confusion https://rumble.com/v1l5f19-tiktok-brainwashes-disgusting-into-you.html 1984 (1956 film) - Edmond O'Brien, Michael Redgrave, Jan Sterling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpGThhWTW2E Animal Farm https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1z3zqt The Obsolete Man S2 Twilight Zone full epsiode https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6ywhne Orwell's final warning - Picture of the future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k_ptxWsadI Orwell's final warning - Picture of the future https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k_ptxWsadI George Orwell's final warning PREDICTED the future?! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBZSm-pKGuo George Orwell and 1984: How Freedom Dies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37N0aFmO19o Nineteen Eighty-Four Explained (1984) | George Orwell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1-2y2XELxU Are they delivering hormones by mosquito? Scientists tricked mosquitoes into delivering vaccines to humans https://bgr.com/science/scientists-tricked-mosquitoes-into-delivering-vaccines-to-humans/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Opinion: Trump Trial for Alleged FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND DEGREE is Contrary to Legal Precedents

By David William Jedell, Attorney at Law April 19, 2024 The Bragg case must b...