By David William Jedell Updated November 1, 2024
Do gooders and Communist Totalitarians want to replace the Constitution (ArtV.1 Overview of Article V, Amending the Constitution, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artV-1/ALDE_00000507/#:~:text=6U.S.%20Const.-,art.,Amendments.%20.%20..%20).
The 2nd Amendment and all of your rights will be gone! If the Constitution is barely being complied with now what makes anybody think an amended Constitution will be followed.
Call your legislators and demand that they drop the idea of a Constitutional Convention. This issue is by far the greatest danger our Republic has ever faced. The way to rein in centralized Government usurpation is by VOTING. Don't just sit idly by in this crisis for your sake and your children and grandchildren. See, Ronald Reagan, https://www.c-span.org/video/?153897-1/ronald-reagans-a-time-choosing-speech
House Resolution, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/101
Article V Commentator Robert Brown Debunks Mark Levin with Madison’s Letters, https://rumble.com/v2wprss-article-v-expert-robert-brown-debunks-mark-levin-with-madisons-letters.html
The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Critics of the compact argue that candidates would have less incentive to focus on regions with smaller populations or fewer urban areas, and would thus be less motivated to address rural issues. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, conceived of the Electoral College as a deliberative body which would weigh the inputs of the states, but not be bound by them, in selecting the president, and would therefore serve to protect the country from the election of a person who is unfit to be president.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact#:~:text=The%20National%20Popular%20Vote%20Interstate,and%20the%20District%20of%20Columbia.
Video. The Late Congressman Larry McDonald on Crossfire in 1983 Discusses the New World Order. Regrettably, shortly after this interview, Dr. McDonald, an outspoken anti communist and chairman of the educational organization the John Birch Society, vanished under bizarre circumstances. On September 1, 1983, he boarded Korean Airlines Flight 007, bound for South Korea. The civilian airliner allegedly veered into Russian airspace. The Soviets then shot the plane down, killing all 269 on board
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy9rjf-QYpQ
Video: "
The Shadows of Power". The rise of the Deep State and the history of the push for a New World Order
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hu6MCVTal1jD/
Time for a Second American Revolution Against the UK?
Global Tyranny that was Rejected by the Declaration of Indepence with the American Revolutionary Wr:
UK police commissioner threatens to extradite, jail US citizens over online posts (even if made by US citizens ON US soil!): 'We'll come after you' 'Being a keyboard warrior does not make you safe from the law' the police commissioner warned. 'Being a keyboard warrior does not make you safe from the law' the police commissioner warned, says King Charles III' police commissioner spokesperson
https://www.foxnews.com/media/uk-police-commissioner-threatens-extradite-jail-us-citizens-over-social-media-posts-we-come-afte
Our Declaration of Independence: He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures...He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people...He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation...For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences...For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. The Parties agree to extradite to each other, pursuant to the provisions of this Treaty, persons sought by the authorities in the Requesting State for trial or punishment for extraditable offenses. This is completely UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/243246/7146.pdf
Violates Fifth Amendment "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of (USA) law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-5/
Subject Matter Jursidiction: The power of a court to hear and decide a particular type of case or matter. Typically, subject matter jurisdiction derives from a federal or state constitution, and the specific parameters of a court's subject matter jurisdiction are defined by the federal or state legislature. State court subject matter jurisdiction includes the civil and criminal laws enacted by a court's own state. State courts can also hear some cases that arise under federal law, unless Congress has reserved exclusive subject matter jurisdiction to the federal courts. For example, patent disputes and federal immigration violations can be heard only in federal courts. State laws often limit the subject matter jurisdiction of certain state courts. Small claims courts are a good example. They have subject matter jurisdiction only when a relatively low amount of money is in dispute—usually in the range of $2,000 to $10,000. Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over civil and criminal laws enacted by Congress. Federal courts can also hear cases involving state laws in some circumstances. For instance, if a state law is challenged on the ground that it violates the U.S. Constitution, a federal court can decide that case. If parties from different states have a case that involves state law, a federal court can hear the case if the amount in dispute is more than $75,000. Parties can't consent to subject matter jurisdiction.
If subject matter jurisdiction doesn't exist, a court has no choice but to dismiss the case.
https://www.nolo.com/dictionary/subject-matter-jurisdiction.html
The Supreme Court has consistently rejected the claim defining “hate speech” as “Speech not protected by the First Amendment, because it is intended to foster hatred against individuals or groups based on race, religion, gender, sexual preference, place of national origin, or other improper classification.” For example, in the 2016 Matal v. Tam decision, the court stressed that this precise position “strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate.'”
https://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/4820490-harris-walz-administration-free-speech/
UK censorship on display! "Schools to teach how to (think) spot fake news, misinformation after UK riots English classes could teach students how to identify
legitimate news sources
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schools-teach-how-spot-fake-news-misinformation-after-uk-riots
Unconstitutional National Popular Vote for President seeks to destroy electoral college in favor of Interstate Compact for Popular Vote for President
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/written-explanation
United Nations adopts ground-breaking Pact for the Future to transform global governance. New York, 22 September 2024 – World leaders today adopted a Pact for the Future that includes a Global Digital Compact (Global Tyranny) and a Declaration on Future Generations. This Pact (Global Government) is the culmination of an inclusive, years-long process to adapt international cooperation to the realities of today and the challenges of tomorrow. The most wide-ranging international agreement in many years, covering entirely new areas as well as issues on which agreement has not been possible in decades, the Pact aims above all to ensure that international institutions can deliver in the face of a world that has changed dramatically since they were created. As the Secretary-General has said, “we cannot create a future fit for our grandchildren with a system built by our grandparents.” The Pact covers a broad range of issues including peace and security, sustainable development,
climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations, and the transformation of global governance.
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2024/09/press-release-sotf-2024/
This expansion to meet their objectives is labeled “
UN 2.0.” This
includes granting the secretary-general increased decision-making abilities and more authority during “public health emergencies.” According to the UN website:
Halfway through the 2030 Agenda, the world is not on track to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. It is not too late to change course, if we all rethink, refocus, and recharge. “UN 2.0” encapsulates the Secretary-General’s vision of a modern UN family, rejuvenated by a forward-thinking culture and empowered by cutting-edge skills for the twenty-first century — to turbocharge our support to people and planet. (Yada Yada Yada.)
https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/un/un-summit-of-the-future-aims-to-bring-global-governance-back-from-the-brink/
Power Grab Attack on Sovereinty: 26 Republican governors have signed a commitment to push back against the WHO’s mandates in their respective states.
https://thenewamerican.com/video/un-denies-its-power-grab-is-an-attack-on-sovereignty/
UNITED NATIONS — Governments and dictators from around the world gathered in New York and adopted a sprawling agreement to expand and further empower the United Nations. The controversial declaration approved by the UN General Assembly, known as the “Pact for the Future,” is seen by the UN and its member governments as a great leap forward for the cause of globalism. In short, the UN is becoming “UN 2.0,” as top leaders of the organization put it. However, in the United States, at least, lawmakers, governors, and grassroots leaders are growing increasingly restless about what they perceive as a historic power grab, putting many attendees at the UN summit on edge. The final agreement adopted at the Summit for the Future formalized those ideas with the backing of virtually every national government and dictatorship on Earth. “We recognize that the multilateral system and its institutions, with the United Nations and its Charter at the center, must be strengthened to keep pace with a changing world,” reads the Pact for the Future, which was adopted by “consensus” featuring token opposition from a handful of governments. One of the major tools to help the UN “renew” trust in globalism is controlling information, as the pact makes clear. It calls on governments to “address” so-called “disinformation, misinformation, hate speech and content inciting harm, including content disseminated through digital platforms.” Of course, “hate speech” was a term introduced into the UN lexicon by the mass-murdering Soviet dictatorship to describe speech it hated. A key theme of the pact was reaffirming commitments to previous UN agreements and schemes such as the UN “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” a tool of tyrants aiming to replace the U.S. understanding of God-given unalienable rights with UN-granted revokable privileges. (The Pact gives the UN Secretary General absolute power.)
https://thenewamerican.com/world-news/un/new-un-pact-for-the-future-turbocharges-globalism/
Deep State Puppets of the USA: SECRETARY OF STATE: Good afternoon. At this summit, The (Socialist/Marxist) UN Secretary-General and many world leaders have argued powerfully that to fulfill the crucial purpose of the United Nations, we urgently need support, reform, and revitalization. The United States fully agrees. That’s why
we joined fellow member states in shaping and committing to a broad range of priorities in the Pact for the Future; forging the Digital Global Compact; signing on to the Declaration on Future Generations;
enabling the United Nations and international institutions to better respond to shocks like pandemics and natural disasters, made more severe by frequent – by the climate crisis; addressing growing and diverse threats to international peace and security on land, the sea, the air, in outer space, and in cyberspace; ensuring that universal human rights are respected equally online and offline; empowering women and girls across the UN’s efforts; reforming the UN Security Council to better represent the developing world and, more broadly, the world as it is today.
https://www.state.gov/secretary-antony-j-blinken-at-the-summit-of-the-future/
Copyright © 2024 by David William Jedell Email: d.w.jedell@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment