Human Lifespan Experience

By David William Jedell Updated July 16, 2025

Whether you are 20 or 90, each moment of life presents an opportunity to focus on what really matters to you

With an increasingly older population, it is about time that our collective mindset on ageing catches up with reality. The negative picture you’ve probably formed about ageing is simply not true. For instance, research into the so-called happiness curve indicates that our level of happiness increases from around midlife and up until the age of 70. Yes, it might take you a little longer to learn new things late in life, and you might perform some activities more slowly than you used to, but there are also many ways in which older age is a strength. With increasing age, you can expect to accumulate better knowledge of the world and become better at retrieving and applying it, and for your emotional intelligence to increase. https://psyche.co/ideas/rather-than-fearing-getting-old-heres-how-to-embrace-it

Book: "Seasons in a Man's Life"

Within the framework of his theory, Levinson described the sequence of stages and transitions for men from 17 to 65 years of age with an emphasis on early and middle adulthood. Adult male development, according to Levinson, starts with the Early Adult Transition (17-22) during which the main tasks are separation from pre-adult world (parents, school, peers, etc.), ending or changing existing relationships, formation of adult identity, making initial decisions regarding their adult way of living and putting them to the test. Entering the Adult World (22 - 28) is the time of exploration, experimentation and adventure, yet laden with two major conflicting tasks: (a) exploring alternatives that adult life has to offer, and at the same time (b) building a stable life structure which implies more responsible decisions and behavior. The next stage, The Age Thirty Transition, is the time for young men to re-evaluate the quality of their life, re-align them with their goals and make crucial choices in regard to marriage, family and occupation. The three stages described above comprise the “novice” phase of adulthood (17-33), as Levinson calls it (Levinson, 1978).

The culminating period of Early Adulthood is Settling Down (33-40) which is characterized by self-investment in the most significant aspects of the life structure: family, career, friendships, and leisure (Levinson, 1978, 1986; Aktu & İlhan, 2017). Toward the end of Settling Down period, Levinson distinguishes a period that he refers to as Becoming One’s Own Man (36-40), during which an adult male acquires more independence, confidence and selfsufficiency (Levinson, 1978).

According to Levinson, the next period, the Mid-Life Transition (40-45), which marks the beginning of Middle Adulthood Era, is the time of psychological turmoil, and represents a developmental crisis. Although for some the transition can be quite smooth, 80% of the participants in Levinson’s research reported personal and social difficulties during this period. Mid-Life Transition Period often results in changes in external and internal aspects of life, such as divorce, change of occupation, moving or changing lifestyle, as well as change in values, goals, and attitudes. Levinson views the resolution of the mid-life transition crisis in the integration of four polarities: Young/Old; Destruction/Creation; Masculine/Feminine; and Attachment/Separateness. According to Levinson, an adult person has better chances of adjusting to middle adulthood through finding new ways of reconciling and incorporating polarities into their developing self. The successful transition to the next stage of building Entering Middle Adulthood (45-50) largely depends on the resolution of the previous stage. The adults who build new life structure based on stronger individuation and deeper attachments will pass through the phase with most satisfaction from life (Levinson, 1978). In his book “Seasons of Woman’s Life” Levinson came to the conclusion that women follow the same sequence of periods in early and middle adulthood as men (Levinson, 1996). He also published in the areas of personality theory and organizational behavior. https://www.assessmentpsychologyboard.org/edp/pdf/Daniel_Levinson.pdf

Women

Women can get pregnant and bear children from puberty when they start getting their menstrual period to menopause when they stop getting it. The average woman’s reproductive years are between ages 12 and 51. Your fertility naturally declines as you get older, which could make it harder for you to conceive. https://www.healthline.com/health/womens-health/childbearing-age#:~:text=Technically%2C%20women%20can%20get%20pregnant%20and%20bear%20children,could%20make%20it%20harder%20for%20you%20to%20conceive.

Menopause is when periods stop for good. It's diagnosed after 12 months without a menstrual period, vaginal bleeding or spotting. Menopause can happen in the 40s or 50s. But the average age is 51 in the United States. Menopause is natural. But the physical symptoms, such as hot flashes, and emotional symptoms of menopause may disrupt sleep, lower energy or affect mood. Most often, menopause happens over time. The months or years leading up to menopause are called perimenopause or the menopausal transition.

During the transition, the amount of hormones your ovaries make varies. Perimenopause can last 2 to 8 years. The average is about four years.

The hormone changes can cause symptoms such as:

Irregular periods.

Vaginal dryness.

Hot flashes.

Night sweats.

Sleep problems.

Mood changes.

Trouble finding words and remembering, often called brain fog.

Different people have different menopause symptoms. Most often, periods are not regular before they end.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/menopause/symptoms-causes/syc-20353397

The data we examined in a study came from 128,294 women in the UK; researchers wanted to explore how the years around the final menstrual period may trigger serious mental health issues, including bipolar and major depressive disorders. They discovered a 112% increase in new cases of bipolar disorder; also found a 30% rise in major depressive conditions during this time, compared to earlier stages of the late reproductive period. https://theconversation.com/perimenopause-linked-with-increased-risk-of-bipolar-and-major-depression-238797

Men

Fertility starts to decline for men when they’re in their late 40s, with up to a 23% annual decline in fertility beginning at age 39[1]. One study suggested that conceiving during a 12-month period was 30% less likely for men who were over the age of 40 compared to men who were under 30 years old https://www.forbes.com/health/mens-health/male-fertility-by-age/

Older People

Negatives Encountered by Some Older People

Your Heart Works Harder

Your Skin Feels Different

You Find It Harder to See and Hear

Your Teeth and Gums Change

Your Bones Become More Brittle

Going to the Bathroom

It’s Harder Getting Around or Staying Strong

Your Sex Life Changes, Too

https://www.webmd.com/healthy-aging/normal-aging

Here are some common signs and symptoms of fatigue in older adults:

11 Causes of Fatigue in Older Adults

Complaints of tiredness or sleepiness

Sleeping an excessive amount at night

Napping frequently during the day

Muscle weakness

Weight loss

Loss of motivation

Agitation or anxiety

Mood swings

Difficulty concentrating

Memory problems

https://bluemoonseniorcounseling.com/10-causes-of-fatigue-in-older-adults/

Depression is a mental health condition that can affect people of all ages including older people. While it is normal to feel down sometimes, if you feel this way for 2 weeks or more, or your mood is affecting your ability to cope with everyday life, you may be experiencing depression. https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/depression-in-older-people

Getting enough sleep helps you stay healthy and alert. Even though older adults need the same seven to nine hours of sleep as all adults, they often don’t get enough. Feeling sick or being in pain can make it harder to sleep, and some medicines can keep you awake. Not getting enough quality sleep can make a person irritable, depressed, forgetful, and more likely to have falls or other accidents. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/healthy-aging/what-do-we-know-about-healthy-aging

If you’re looking for a job at age 65 or older, think about these career options. These fields have large numbers of older employees, according to U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data.

Here are 15 in-demand jobs for seniors:

Health services

Wholesale and retail trade

Professional and business services

Education

Manufacturing

Construction

Transportation

Finance and insurance

Real estate

Hospitality

Leisure

Land-related work

Information

Animal care

Utilities

https://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/articles/in-demand-jobs-for-seniors

Insomnia is a common sleep disorder characterized by a persistent difficulty to fall or remain asleep despite the opportunity to do so. People with insomnia also experience excessive daytime sleepiness and other cognitive impairments while they are awake that directly stem from sleep loss. People may have sleep-onset insomnia, which causes difficulty falling asleep, or sleep maintenance insomnia, which causes difficulty staying asleep. Some people with insomnia experience sleep onset and sleep maintenance issues. According to current estimates, 10-30% of adults. It is a common sleep disorder characterized by a persistent difficulty to fall or remain asleep despite the opportunity to do so. People with insomnia also experience excessive daytime sleepiness and other cognitive impairments while they are awake that directly stem from sleep loss. People may have sleep-onset insomnia, which causes difficulty falling asleep, or sleep maintenance insomnia, which causes difficulty staying asleep. Some people with insomnia experience sleep onset and sleep maintenance issues. https://www.sleepfoundation.org/insomnia/older-adults

Erectile Dysfunction in the Elderly: An Old Widespread Issue with Novel Treatment Perspectives. All epidemiologic studies clearly show an increasing age-related prevalence and severity of ED. Data from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study documented a tripling of the overall probability of complete ED from 5% in men aged 40 years to 15% in men aged 70 years https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3976909/#:~:text=All%20epidemiologic%20studies%20clearly%20show,aged%2070%20years%20%5B6%5D

Women may show signs of aging sooner and at a faster rate than men:

Facial aging

Women's faces age faster than men's, especially between the ages of 50 and 60. Signs of aging include a flatter face, deeper nasolabial folds, and sagging soft tissue.

Cellular aging

A study of 33 million biopsy reports found that women's cells show signs of aging as early as age 19, while men's cells don't show signs until age 40.

Menopause

Menopause is a major factor in accelerated aging for women. The hormonal changes that occur during menopause directly affect skin composition

Collagen density

Men have a higher density of collagen in their skin than women, which can make women appear older.

Mitochondrial aging

Estrogens may protect against mitochondrial aging, which can explain why women have delayed mitochondrial aging compared to men

https://www.google.com/search?q=women+show+signs+of+ageing+sooner+than+men&rlz=1C1CHBD_enUS1014US1014&oq=women+show+signs+of+ageing+sooner+than+men&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRiPAjIHCAIQIRiPAtIBCTIxMjIzajBqNKgCALACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Men do have the advantage when it comes to skin. The male hormone testosterone makes men’s skin about 25 percent thicker than women’s skin, which means they are less susceptible to early signs of aging. They also have more collagen – so it takes longer for wrinkles to appear! Men also have more moisture on their skin as they typically sweat more – this gives them a “natural” protection that women do not have. All these factors add up to fewer signs of aging on men’s skin than women’s. https://www.askinclinic.co.uk/2017/06/05/men-vs-women-ages-quicker/

Urinary Incontinence in Older Adults

Urinary incontinence means a person leaks urine by accident. While it can happen to anyone, urinary incontinence, also known as overactive bladder, is more common in older people, especially women. Bladder control issues can be embarrassing and cause people to avoid their normal activities. But incontinence can often be stopped or controlled.

What happens in the body to cause bladder control problems? Located in the lower abdomen, the bladder is a hollow organ that is part of the urinary system, which also includes the kidneys, ureters, and urethra. During urination, muscles in the bladder tighten to move urine into the tube-shaped urethra. At the same time, the muscles around the urethra relax and let the urine pass out of the body. When the muscles in and around the bladder don’t work the way they should, urine can leak, resulting in urinary incontinence. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/bladder-health-and-incontinence/urinary-incontinence-older-adults

Urinary incontinence (involuntary loss of urine) is twice as common in women as in men and affects at least 1 in 3 older women. Urinary incontinence is not a normal result of aging; it is a medical problem that is often curable and should be treated. Urine is stored in the bladder and emptied via a tube called the urethra. During urination, muscles of the bladder wall contract, forcing urine from the bladder into the urethra. Sphincter muscles surrounding the urethra relax, releasing urine from the body. Incontinence occurs if bladder muscles suddenly contract or sphincter muscles are not strong enough to contain urine. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/185997

Bowel incontinence (also called fecal incontinence) is when you’re not able to control your bowel movements. It's a common problem, especially among older adults, and ranges from irregular stool leaks while passing gas to a total loss of control of your bowels. https://www.webmd.com/digestive-disorders/bowel-incontinence

As you age, it’s normal to suffer from aches and pains in your joints and muscles as you lose muscle mass and bone density. Normal aches and pains caused by aging include:

Neck pain or stiffness

Lower back pain

Knee pain or stiffness

Wrist pain or swelling

Elbow pain

Pelvic pain

Headache

Heartburn

Age-related aches and pains can typically be managed at home. However, some aches may be a sign that something is wrong. Whatever the underlying reason, early diagnosis and treatment can help slow the progression of age-related diseases.

What are abnormal aches and pains? Aches and pains that may signal that something is wrong include the following:

Chest pain

Dizziness

Severe, sudden, or persistent pain

Pain with numbness or tingling

Swelling over a joint

Sudden changes in vision

Loss of bowel or bladder control

Unexplained weight loss

Increased urine frequency

Difficulty passing urine

Difficulty breathing

Severe headache

Uncontrolled vomiting

Fever

Weakness or paralysis

Postmenopausal vaginal bleeding

Blood in stools

https://www.medicinenet.com/what_are_normal_aches_and_pains_as_you_age/article.htm

When a person gets older, their ability to hear may gradually decrease over time. This process is referred to as age-related hearing loss. Age-related hearing loss, otherwise known as presbycusis, is common. Research shows that roughly one-third of people over the age of 65 will deal with some loss of hearing. Hearing loss is more than just having difficulty hearing what a person is saying. There are several variations and symptoms that develop in someone who has age-related hearing loss. These include:

Hearing mumbled or slurred speech when people are speaking

Having issues with distinguishing sounds that are high in pitch

Being unable to have or understand a conversation unless there is complete silence in the background

Feeling as though some specific sounds are annoying and excessively louder than they should be

Ringing in the ears, known as tinnitus

https://www.verywellhealth.com/age-related-hearing-loss-5220954#:~:text=When%20a%20person%20gets%20older%2C%20their%20ability%20to,65%20will%20deal%20with%20some%20loss%20of%20hearing.

Financial insecurity

While we are living longer, unfortunately, the world of employment and retirement has not evolved at the same pace. Many elderly people are able and more than willing to work past the standard retirement age, but the opportunities are not there. In addition, managing day to day finances and planning for later life can be challenging for older generations as much is now done online or remotely. This can also leave them more vulnerable to fraud and scams.

Difficulty with everyday tasks and mobility

A person’s mobility and dexterity will naturally decline as they age, which makes completing everyday tasks more difficult. This can gradually cause people to care for themselves and prevents them from being social, pursuing interests, or taking part in activities they enjoy. More support is needed to enable elderly people not only to live independently through products and programs which focus on safety, balance, fitness, and mobility but also to ensure they can continue to thrive as an individual. https://www.smithlifehomecare.com/blog/what-are-the-biggest-challenges-for-elderly-people-in-our-society/

9 Reasons Why Reminiscing Can Benefit Seniors

1. Preserves Family History

2. Helps Improve Coping Skills

3. Reduces Symptoms of Depression

4. Promotes Physical Health

5. Works Through Unresolved Conflicts

6. Eliminates Boredom

7. Improves Communication Skills

8. Reduces Stress

9. Enhances Self-Esteem

https://caringseniorservice.com/blog/9-reasons-why-reminiscing-can-benefit-seniors/

Looking Back Subjective Time Seems to Go Faster

“As we get older, each year is a smaller proportion of our lives. For example, a year is 1/10 of the life of a 10 year old, but 1/70th of the life of a 70 year old. Therefore each year feels shorter relative to all the time we've lived and thus seems to be going by faster.” https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2017/02/space-now-and-time.html

The Art of Grandparenting: Building Strong Relationships with Your Grandchildren

By embracing your role, respecting parental boundaries, and offering your wisdom and support, you can leave an indelible mark on the lives of your grandchildren. The relationships you build will not only enrich their lives but yours as well, creating a legacy of love and connection that will span generations. Becoming a grandparent is one of life's greatest joys, and for the baby boomer generation, it often signifies a new chapter filled with love, wisdom, and the opportunity to make a lasting impact on the lives of their grandchildren. Building strong and meaningful relationships with your grandchildren is a journey that's not only deeply rewarding but also vital for the well-being and development of the younger generation. Embrace Your Role as a Grandparent. The first step in building a strong relationship with your grandchildren is to embrace your role. Recognize that you're not a parent, but rather a unique and cherished presence in their lives. Your wisdom, life experiences, and unconditional love are your greatest assets in this role. Listen and Communicate. Open and effective communication is key to any successful relationship. Take the time to listen to your grandchildren, show genuine interest in their thoughts, dreams, and concerns, and be a supportive, non-judgmental presence in their lives. https://www.babyboomers.com/the-art-of-grandparenting-building-strong-relationships-with-your-grandchildren

Less loneliness, better mental health seen in those who visit, care for grandchildren often. People with at least one grandchild were more likely than those without grandkids to say they hardly ever feel isolated. In all, 72% of those with grandchildren say they hardly ever feel isolated compared with 62% of those without grandchildren. People without grandkids were also more likely to say their mental health is fair or poor compared with those who have grandchildren, 13% versus 9%. Grandparents who see their grandkids more often were less likely to say they feel isolated. Overall, 78% of those who see grandchildren under 18 every day or nearly every day said they hardly ever feel isolated, compared with 65% of those who see them every few months or less. Also, 73% of those who see their grandchildren at least weekly or once or twice a month said they hardly ever feel isolated. Grandparents who see their grandchildren only every few months or less were more likely to say their mental health is fair or poor, 13%, compared with those who see them at least once a week, 4%, or once or twice a month, 8%. https://news.umich.edu/grandparents-help-grandkids-in-many-waysbut-the-reverse-may-be-true-too-u-m-poll-suggests/

Ageism

A lot of the stereotypes that adults associate with older people have been internalized from childhood. We have all read children’s stories where the wicked witch is portrayed as a mean older woman, such as “Hansel and Gretel”, and stories which show grandmothers as being sickly or frail such as “LittleRed Riding Hood.” Research has shown that children start to identify age stereotypes from their culture by age six years old. Media and advertisements have increased the ageist belief in girls, that as they age, they will have to prevent wrinkles or color their hair to be more beautiful and accepted. By the time we reach an older age, we have grown up constantly hearing and internalizing negative stereotypes about older people and then we realize that we are now at the same age associated with those stereotypes. We start to think that the stereotypes pertain to us too since we are also “old.” https://publichealth.wustl.edu/internalized-ageism-discriminating-against-ourselves-as-we-age/

Ageism leads to a lost sense of purpose

There are lots of outdated stereotypes about elderly people, which can lead to isolation and marginalization in a lot of communities. By coming up with innovative ways to involve older people in the community through social events, we can not only help them to maintain a sense of identity and self-esteem but also tap into the wealth of knowledge and experience they have, which is so vital for the development of society.

Erik Erikson’s Stages of Psychosocial Development: Stage 8. Ego Integrity vs. Despair

Ego integrity versus despair is the eighth and final stage of Erik Erikson’s stage theory of psychosocial development. This stage begins at approximately age 65 and ends at death. It is during this time that we contemplate our accomplishments and can develop integrity if we see ourselves as leading a successful life. As we grow older (65+ yrs) and become senior citizens, we tend to slow down our productivity and explore life as retired people. Thus, late life is characterized by integrity and despair as alternating states that must be balanced. https://www.simplypsychology.org/erik-erikson.html

Gerontophobia (morbid fear or dislike of old persons), rooted in a fear or anxiety associated with aging and elderly individuals can manifest in various ways, such as discomfort, avoidance, or even discrimination towards the elderly. It is essential to recognize that gerontophobia is not a natural or inherent fear, but rather a learned response influenced by societal attitudes, personal experiences, and the portrayal of aging in media. https://www.parxhhc.com/resources/fear-of-elderly-people

Memories, Regrets and Wisdom

Although our memories seem to be a solid, straightforward sum of who we are, strong evidence suggests that memories are actually quite complex, subject to change. We reconstruct memories as we age and also as our worldview changes. We falsely recall childhood events, and through effective suggestion, can even create new false memories. We can be tricked into remembering events that never happened, or change the details of things that really did happen. You can actually modify your memories and just see them in the most positive light. Even changing them entrely, and selectively forgetting as well. https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2022/05/soy-insulating-car-wires-why-is-there.html

Profound Brain Changes and Non Linear Thinking. The brain is actually soft-wired, meaning it is plastic and malleable, undergoing significant changes as we learn and age. When neuronal circuits are fine-tuned for whatever reason, gray matter tends to be pruned back while white matter connections increase, allowing information to travel around the brain more efficiently (and for a higher IQ). https://www.sciencealert.com/profound-brain-changes-of-pregnancy-revealed-in-scientific-first

Age can dull the ability to remember things. By age 60, more than half of adults have concerns about their memory. However, minor memory lapses that occur with age are not usually signs of a serious problem, such as Alzheimer’s disease, but rather the result of normal changes in the structure and function of the brain. This report, Improving Memory: Understanding age-related memory loss, describes these normal age-related changes and other more serious causes of memory loss — and how to distinguish between them. https://www.health.harvard.edu/mind-and-mood/improving-memory-understanding-age-related-memory-loss#:~:text=Age%20can%20dull%20the%20ability%20to%20remember%20things.,your%20ability%20to%20retain%20new%20information%20and%20skills.

It’s normal to forget things once in a while at any age, but serious memory problems make it hard to do everyday things such as driving, using the phone, and finding the way home.

Signs that it might be time to talk with a doctor include:

Asking the same questions over and over again

Getting lost in places you used to know well

Having trouble following recipes or directions

Becoming more confused about time, people, and places

https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/memory-loss-and-forgetfulness/memory-problems-forgetfulness-and-aging

No Need For Regrets

Beginning as a young child and throughout your young adulthood, you aspire to be great, and you deal with things as they come up on the path, and you lived your life the only way you could have, making decisions that had to be made along the way the best you could, so be happy you lived all that, good and bad, and have no regrets. The quality of your wisdom, when it sufficiently develops, will be based on all your experiences, good and bad. Remember, today is the first day of the rest of your life. https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2018/09/no-regrets.html

Your Life Experience Changed the Reading of Your Children and Grandchildrens' DNA for the Better

Someone’s lifetime can change the way their DNA is expressed, and how that change can be passed on to the next generation. This is the process of epigenetics, where the readability, or expression, of genes is modified without changing the DNA code itself. Tiny chemical tags are added to or removed from our DNA in response to changes in the environment in which we are living. This may be a major purpose of life that you fulfilled by just living and adapting. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190326-what-is-epigenetics

Facing the Prospect of End of Life (and Beyond?)

Video: Renown Psychiatrist Carl Jung about facing the prosect of end of life (Rare Face to Face Interview) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWAicIovVzU

Carl Jung

Copyright © 2025 by David William Jedell

Email: d.w.jedell@gmail.com

Why Having No Regrets is the Best Way to Live

By David William Jedell                           Updated June 26, 2025
 
You aspire to be great, and you deal with things as they come up on the path, and you lived your life the only way you could have, making decisions that had to be made along the way the best you could, so be happy you lived all that, good and bad, and have no regrets.

The quality of your wisdom, when it sufficiently develops, will be based on all your experiences, good and bad. Remember, today is the first day of the rest of your life.

For Perspective

Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO5FwsblpT8

Copyright © 2025 David William Jedell
Email: d.w.jedell@gmail.com

È inconfutabile! Il "Tempo" è sempre presente; Ovunque. Scusa Einstein, non c'è prova del tempo in sé e per sé; È solo uno strumento matematico di misurazione della quantità di moto relativa

Di David William Jedell Aggiornato il 30 settembre 2024

"È più facile ingannare le persone che convincerle di essere state ingannate." -Mark Twain. Perché un concetto così ovvio rimane sconosciuto da quando si è sviluppata la coscienza? Immanuel Kant affrontò in modo insufficiente la questione del "Tempo", insieme ad altri filosofi e fisici molto famosi. Pertanto, è un argomento molto importante, tuttavia né Kant né nessun altro ha visto la semplice verità che il tempo in sé e per sé non esiste, sebbene forniscano sofismi per ingannare i lettori con pensieri fallaci immaginari e irrilevanti. I fatti sono i seguenti: è sempre Adesso. Se i fisici, i matematici e gli altri scienziati accettassero questo fatto ovvio e ignorassero la propaganda scientifica e il “requisito” della revisione tra pari, ci avvicineremmo a una migliore comprensione di tutto. Sfido chiunque a confutare questo documento.

Esistiamo nel nostro punto di riferimento spaziale locale (area spaziale dove i cambiamenti nell'oggetto, nell'energia e nella posizione delle onde sono all'interno della nostra percezione sensoriale cosciente). Il costrutto dell'illusione del Tempo deriva dal nostro unico punto di riferimento sulla terra, dando origine all'inferenza cosciente di Passato, Ora e Futuro. Ti sei mai svegliato quando non era Adesso? Il battito di un orologio è prodotto solo da ingranaggi coordinati con una frazione della rotazione terrestre che chiamiamo "secondo". Non tiene traccia del "Tempo". Sta tenendo traccia della relazione tra due movimenti. La "velocità" di questi movimenti non è inerente al Tempo come cosa in sé e per sé, ma piuttosto nel rapporto tra la distanza percorsa dall'oggetto e una frazione arbitraria della rotazione ciclica terrestre come costante (cioè il rapporto tra da uno a 24, o una "ora"). Spazio e Ora sono la stessa cosa. È solo la coscienza che crea l'illusione del Tempo; senza di essa la Terra esisterebbe per l’eternità. Tuttavia, l’universo in realtà non “esisterebbe” affatto senza la coscienza perché l’esistenza è strettamente un costrutto cosciente.

Quando si verifica un evento, come la collisione di due oggetti davanti a noi, lo immagazziniamo nella memoria. Quando quell'evento si è spostato fuori dal nostro Spazio locale, e c'è un altro evento in una sequenza ordinata, ci illudiamo credendo che la percezione cosciente del primo evento ordinato in sequenza sia avvenuta nel "passato", come risultato del fatto che l'evento non genera più impulsi sensoriali (cioè non lo vedi più di fronte a te). Tuttavia quell'evento e le sue energie continuano ancora nei loro effetti nello Spazio che non è locale. Poiché la nostra mente cosciente può rivedere le percezioni della memoria e la mancanza delle stesse percezioni sensoriali immediate che si verificano simultaneamente (cioè, non le vedi più), viene creato il costrutto mentale che esiste un passato e un presente. Questo non è reale ma è errato. Per quanto riguarda il "futuro", i movimenti e le coincidenze negli "eventi" (cioè i percorsi di due oggetti in collisione) non si sono verificati nel nostro riferimento spaziale locale. Il futuro può solo essere immaginato, previsto o sperato, ma se esistesse, sarebbe nel nostro Spazio locale. Ci sono movimenti della materia e un "osservatore" sensoriale, tuttavia lo Spazio è sempre Adesso e Ora è sempre Spazio. Le cosiddette "dilatazioni temporali" nella fisica relativistica sono, nella migliore delle ipotesi, accelerazioni della quantità di moto nell'Adesso.

Tuttavia Einstein non applica il suo postulato secondo cui tutti i sistemi inerziali sono equivalenti. Quindi, l'osservatore sull'astronave vede l'orologio sulla terra andare più lentamente mentre l'osservatore sulla terra vede l'orologio sull'astronave andare più lentamente alla stessa identica velocità. Poiché tutti i sistemi inerziali sono uguali, quando i due osservatori vengono riuniti, il numero di clic dei loro orologi è fisicamente lo stesso. Altrimenti l'osservatore sull'astronave vedrebbe la Terra girare come una trottola, e l'astronave diventerebbe un sistema di riferimento "privilegiato" che la Relatività Ristretta non consente.

Inoltre, secondo la Relatività Speciale di Einstein, la luce si muove sempre in linea retta. Nel suo famoso esperimento mentale, la luce lascia l'emettitore e si dirige verso il ricevitore ad angolo. Questo è impossibile. In realtà, il raggio deve muoversi dritto su e giù. È l'astronave che si muove, tutto qui, e nella direzione opposta si "muove" anche il telaio "corretto". Gli orologi non sono il "Tempo" stesso, ma piuttosto misurano e confrontano i movimenti relativi. L'uso della luce, con la sua velocità costante in tutti i fotogrammi di riferimento, per misurare la frequenza dei clic, è semplicemente un modo conveniente per confrontare esattamente il cosiddetto numero corretto di clic del fotogramma con il numero relativo di clic del fotogramma.

Il rallentamento o lo spostamento verso il rosso della luce che si allontana da un oggetto vicino all'orizzonte degli eventi di un buco nero (o di una stella di neutroni oscura) è proprio questo; il rallentamento dei fotoni nella stretta della forte gravità continua nello Spazio-Ora. Non vi è alcuna prova che il Tempo rallenti o addirittura esista di per sé. Uno dei principali ostacoli all’accettazione generale del fatto che il tempo è una comodità matematica o uno strumento per confrontare i movimenti relativi nella vita di tutti i giorni, e non una cosa in sé e per sé, è che le lingue, come l’inglese, sono pervase di parole che esprimono il tempo. come una cosa in sé e per sé, come "accaduto", "era", "ieri", domani" e molte altre espressioni del passato e del futuro. Calendari, orologi e appuntamenti sono altri ostacoli alla comprensione dello Spazio. Attribuire una dimensione al Tempo è analogo ad attribuire una dimensione a un righello di 12 pollici e chiamarlo distanza. Allo stesso modo gli orologi non sono il tempo stesso. Inoltre, l'ipotesi Sapir-Whorf afferma che la struttura grammaticale e verbale del linguaggio di una persona influenza il modo in cui lo fa percepiscono il mondo. Sottolinea che il linguaggio determina o influenza i propri pensieri https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2022/05/roe-v-wade-getting-worked-up-over.html.

Esperimento mentale

Invece di cercare di pensare a questo con il nostro imperfetto sistema di linguaggio verbale, prova a pensare in modo spaziale a ciò che sta realmente accadendo. Ecco un semplice esempio di comprensione spaziale di questo; un esperimento mentale. Un aereo di linea situato sull'equatore decolla verso ovest. Quando raggiunge i 35.000 piedi viaggia a 1.000 miglia orarie alla velocità rispetto al suolo. Il pilota ha solo una meridiana davanti alla cabina di pilotaggio che può vedere dall'interno. Nessuno sull'aereo ha un orologio o un orologio. L'ombra del quadrante solare indica che sono le 15:00 quando si raggiungono i 35.000 piedi. Il sole può essere visto in alto. Dopo che l'aereo ha percorso 6.000 miglia, la meridiana è nella stessa posizione delle 15:00 e il sole non si è mosso. È ancora alto nel cielo. Il pilota e tutti gli occupanti dell'aereo pensano che il tempo si sia fermato durante il volo. Confermano questa valutazione anche quando atterrano e impiegano qualche minuto per raggiungere l'aeroporto. Tutti gli orologi alle pareti e tutti gli orologi della gente segnano le 15:05. A terra, nell'aeroporto da cui è partito l'aereo, il personale dell'equipaggio di terra guarda l'orologio e vede che segnano le 21:00. È anche notte, le stelle brillano. Confrontano il ricordo di una giornata soleggiata con l'attuale input sensoriale della notte senza sole. Costruiscono l'illusione del tempo. Invece il pilota e i passeggeri ricevono l'attuale input sensoriale di un sole splendente e di una meridiana che non si è mossa durante il volo. Infine, il pilota e i passeggeri vengono informati che si stanno spostando nello Spazio da un'area all'altra dello Spazio e che hanno superato 6 "Fusi Orari Stabiliti". Il pilota e i passeggeri accettano questa spiegazione dopo averci riflettuto. Ma il personale di terra ritiene che siano le 21 e che siano trascorse 6 ore di "Tempo" perché le lancette dei loro orologi si sono mosse e il sole è tramontato ed è notte. L'equipaggio si aggrappa all'illusione come facevano le persone quando la terra era piatta e il centro dell'universo, rifiutando Colombo e Copernico sul letto di morte e bruciando Guido sul rogo per eresia.

Non può esserci "viaggio nel tempo" senza tempo, e la "freccia del tempo" può essere facilmente invertita senza alcuna reale differenza, vale a dire che il "tempo" si sposta dal futuro al passato o si sposta dal passato al futuro. Teoricamente, per viaggiare nel "Passato", tutti i vettori di causa ed effetto dovrebbero essere invertiti, e ci vorrebbero 150 anni per tornare indietro di 150 anni. Tuttavia, ciò non è possibile. Nemmeno viaggiare verso il “futuro” perché richiederebbe un aumento della quantità di moto di tutti i vettori della quantità di moto, cosa che non può essere fatta. Inoltre, l’entropia non solo è un concetto imperfetto (cioè l’uovo era un miscuglio di particelle prima di essere assemblato ordinatamente in un uovo e poi lasciato cadere in un disordine caotico), ma non dimostra l’esistenza del tempo. Il cono di luce di Einstein, in quanto rappresenta lo spazio, è una struttura corretta con una falsa premessa, cioè che in alto c'è il "Tempo" nel "futuro" che scende verso il centro che è il "Tempo" nel "presente". " quindi inferiore che è il "Tempo" nel "passato". In realtà, la parte superiore è piena di eventi il ​​cui slancio non ha avuto una sequenza nel nostro spazio. Il centro è il nostro spazio sensoriale, e il fondo è dove la quantità di moto si è spostata dal nostro spazio sensoriale all'esterno del nostro spazio sensoriale. Tutto dentro ORA! Possiamo spiegare l'intero universo senza l'illusione del "Tempo" in sé e per sé.

Il fatto che la luce viaggi velocemente non prova l’esistenza del tempo

Piuttosto che un cono di luce, è più accurato rappresentare un cerchio che rappresenta la tua area cosciente di percezione sensoriale. Le frecce all'esterno del cerchio puntate verso l'interno del cerchio rappresentano momenti o eventi separati in sequenza che non hanno influenzato la tua percezione ma sono pronti a farlo. Vedi, https://www.dreamstime.com/illustration/arrows-pointing-to-circle-middle.html Le frecce all'interno del cerchio (o della sfera) rivolte verso l'esterno sono eventi o slanci che influenzano la tua percezione ma si stanno allontanando. Vedi, https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/arrows-outwards-circle-round-shape-vector-illustration-gm1473703846-503768100

Una sequenza non dipende dal "Tempo", cioè la sequenza 1,2,3 sarà sempre 1,2,3 non importa quanto la Terra abbia ruotato o si sia rivoltata. Una sequenza è indipendente dal tempo. La probabilità che i costrutti soggettivi di cui sopra descrivano accuratamente fatti oggettivi è la più alta possibile.

"Il pensiero critico serio e lo scetticismo nei confronti di affermazioni nuove e persino vecchie non sono solo ammissibili, sono incoraggiati e desiderabili in quanto essenza della scienza." -Carl Sagan

Riferimento al cono di luce di Einstein https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone

Dilatazione del "tempo" della Relatività Speciale 7.2.2 Time dilation http://www.thestargarden.co.uk/Special-relativity.html

Copyright © 2024 di David William Jedell Email: d.w.jedell@gmail.com

To niepodważalne! „Czas” jest zawsze teraz; Wszędzie. Przykro mi, Einsteinie, nie ma dowodu na istnienie czasu samego w sobie; To tylko matematyczne narzędzie pomiaru pędu względnego

Przez David William Jedell Zaktualizowano 30 Wrzesień 2024

„Łatwiej jest oszukać ludzi, niż przekonać ich, że zostali oszukani.” - Marka Twaina.

Dlaczego tak oczywista koncepcja pozostaje nieodkryta, odkąd rozwinęła się świadomość? Immanuel Kant, podobnie jak inni bardzo znani filozofowie i fizyki, w niewystarczający sposób zajął się kwestią „czasu”. Jest to zatem temat bardzo ważny, jednakże ani Kant, ani nikt inny nie dostrzegł prostej prawdy, że czas sam w sobie nie istnieje, choć posługują się sofistyką mającą zwieść czytelników wyimaginowanymi i nieistotnymi, błędnymi myślami. Fakty są następujące: Zawsze jest Teraz. Gdyby fizycy, matematycy i inni naukowcy zaakceptowali ten oczywisty fakt i zlekceważyli propagandę naukową oraz „wymóg recenzowania”, zbliżylibyśmy się do lepszego zrozumienia wszystkiego. Wzywam każdego, aby obalił tę tezę.

Istniejemy w naszym lokalnym punkcie odniesienia w przestrzeni kosmicznej (obszar przestrzenny, w którym zmiany obiektu, energii i położenia fali zachodzą w ramach naszej świadomej percepcji zmysłowej). Złudzenie konstrukcji Czasu następuje w wyniku naszego pojedynczego punktu odniesienia na Ziemi, dając podstawę do świadomego wnioskowania o Przeszłości, Teraźniejszości i Przyszłości. Czy kiedykolwiek obudziłeś się, gdy nie było „Teraz”? Tykanie zegarka wykonują wyłącznie koła zębate skoordynowane z ułamkiem obrotu Ziemi, który nazywamy „sekundą”. Nie śledzi „Czasu”. Śledzi relację dwóch ruchów. „Prędkość” tych ruchów nie jest związana z czasem jako rzeczą samą w sobie, ale raczej ze stosunkiem odległości, jaką pokonuje obiekt, do dowolnego ułamka cyklicznego obrotu Ziemi jako stałej (tj. od jednego do 24, czyli „godzina”). Przestrzeń i Teraz to to samo. Tylko świadomość stwarza iluzję czasu; bez niego Ziemia istniałaby w wieczności. Jednakże wszechświat w rzeczywistości w ogóle „nie istniałby” bez świadomości, ponieważ istnienie jest ściśle świadomym konstruktem. Kiedy ma miejsce jakieś wydarzenie, na przykład zderzenie dwóch obiektów przed nami, przechowujemy je w pamięci. Kiedy to wydarzenie przesunęło się poza naszą lokalną Przestrzeń i w uporządkowanej sekwencji następuje inne wydarzenie, łudzimy się, że świadoma percepcja pierwszego sekwencyjnie uporządkowanego zdarzenia miała miejsce w „przeszłości” w wyniku faktu, że wydarzenie nie generuje już impulsów zmysłowych (tj. nie widzisz go już przed sobą). Jednakże to wydarzenie i jego energie nadal wywierają swoje skutki w przestrzeni, która jest nielokalna. Ponieważ nasz świadomy umysł może dokonać przeglądu percepcji pamięci i braku tych samych bezpośrednich percepcji zmysłowych, które występują jednocześnie (tj. już tego nie widzisz), powstaje mentalny konstrukt, że istnieje przeszłość i teraźniejszość. Nie jest to zgodne z faktami, ale błędne. Jeśli chodzi o „przyszłość”, ruchy i zbieżności w „zdarzeniach” (tj. zderzeniach ścieżek dwóch obiektów) nie występowały w naszym lokalnym odniesieniu do przestrzeni. Przyszłość można jedynie sobie wyobrazić, przewidzieć lub mieć na nią nadzieję, ale gdyby istniała, to byłaby w naszej lokalnej przestrzeni. Istnieją ruchy materii i zmysłowy „obserwator”, jednakże Przestrzeń jest zawsze Teraz, a Teraz jest zawsze Przestrzenią. Tak zwane „dylatacje czasu” w fizyce relatywistycznej są w najlepszym razie przyspieszeniami pędu w teraźniejszości.

Einstein nie stosuje jednak własnego postulatu, że wszystkie układy inercjalne są równoważne. Zatem obserwator na statku kosmicznym widzi, że zegar na Ziemi jedzie wolniej, podczas gdy obserwator na Ziemi widzi, że zegar na statku kosmicznym jedzie wolniej w dokładnie tym samym tempie. Ponieważ wszystkie układy inercjalne są równe, po ponownym połączeniu dwóch obserwatorów liczba kliknięć ich zegarów jest fizycznie taka sama. W przeciwnym razie obserwator na statku kosmicznym widziałby, jak Ziemia wiruje jak szczyt, a statek kosmiczny byłby „uprzywilejowanym” układem odniesienia, na który nie pozwala szczególna teoria względności. Co więcej, zgodnie ze szczególną teorią względności Einsteina, światło zawsze porusza się po linii prostej. W jego słynnym eksperymencie myślowym światło opuszcza emiter i kieruje się pod kątem prosto w stronę odbiornika. To jest niemożliwe. Właściwie wiązka musi poruszać się prosto w górę i w dół. To statek kosmiczny się porusza i tyle, i w przeciwnym kierunku „właściwy” kadr również „porusza się”. Zegary nie są samym „Czasem”, ale raczej mierzą i porównują ruchy względne. Wykorzystanie światła o stałej prędkości we wszystkich klatkach odniesienia do pomiaru współczynnika kliknięć jest po prostu wygodnym sposobem dokładnego porównania tzw. właściwej liczby kliknięć klatki z relatyczną liczbą kliknięć klatki.

Właśnie na tym polega spowolnienie lub przesunięcie ku czerwieni światła oddalającego się od obiektu w pobliżu horyzontu zdarzeń czarnej dziury (lub ciemnej gwiazdy neutronowej); spowolnienie fotonów w uścisku silnej grawitacji trwa nadal w Przestrzeni-Teraz. Nie ma dowodów na to, że Czas zwalnia lub nawet istnieje sam w sobie. Główną przeszkodą w ogólnej akceptacji faktu, że czas jest matematycznym ułatwieniem lub narzędziem do porównywania względnych ruchów w życiu codziennym, a nie rzeczą samą w sobie, jest to, że języki takie jak angielski są przesiąknięte słowami wyrażającymi czas jako rzecz samą w sobie, na przykład „zdarzyło się”, „było”, „wczoraj”, jutro” i wiele innych wyrażeń czasów przeszłych i przyszłych. Kalendarze, zegary i spotkania są kolejną przeszkodą w zrozumieniu Przestrzeni. wymiar czasu jest analogiczny do przypisywania wymiaru 12-calowej linijce i nazywania go odległością. W ten sam sposób zegary same w sobie nie są czasem. Co więcej, hipoteza Sapira-Whorfa stwierdza, że ​​gramatyczna i werbalna struktura języka danej osoby wpływa na to, jak postrzegają świat. Podkreśla, że ​​język determinuje myśli lub wpływa na nie. https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2022/05/roe-v-wade-getting-worked-up-over.html.

Eksperyment myślowy

Zamiast próbować to przemyśleć za pomocą naszego wadliwego systemu języka werbalnego, spróbuj myśleć przestrzennie o tym, co się faktycznie dzieje. Oto prosty przykład przestrzennego zrozumienia tego; eksperyment myślowy. Liniowiec odrzutowy znajdujący się na równiku startuje na zachód. Kiedy osiągnie 35 000 stóp, porusza się z prędkością 1000 mil na godzinę. Pilot ma przed kokpitem jedynie zegar słoneczny, który widzi ze środka. Nikt w samolocie nie ma zegarka ani zegarka. Cień tarczy słonecznej wskazuje, że po osiągnięciu wysokości 35 000 stóp jest godzina 15:00. Słońce widać wysoko w górze. Po przebyciu przez samolot 6000 mil zegar słoneczny znajduje się w tej samej pozycji, czyli godzinie 15:00, a słońce się nie porusza. Wciąż jest wysoko na niebie. Pilot i wszyscy pasażerowie samolotu myślą, że podczas lotu czas się zatrzymał. Potwierdzają tę ocenę nawet po wylądowaniu i dotarcie na lotnisko zajmuje kilka minut. Wszystkie zegary na ścianach i zegarki wszystkich ludzi wskazują godzinę 15:05.

Na ziemi na lotnisku, z którego odleciał samolot, obsługa naziemna spogląda na zegarki i stwierdza, że ​​wskazują godzinę 21:00. Jest też noc, gwiazdy świecą. Porównują swoje wspomnienie słonecznego dnia z obecnymi wrażeniami zmysłowymi dotyczącymi nocy i braku słońca. Konstruują iluzję czasu. Podczas gdy pilot i pasażerowie mają aktualne dane sensoryczne dotyczące świecącego słońca i tarczy słonecznej, która nie poruszyła się podczas lotu. Na koniec pilot i pasażerowie zostają poinformowani, że przemieszczają się w przestrzeni kosmicznej z jednego obszaru przestrzeni do drugiego i że minęli 6 „ustalonych stref czasowych”. Pilot i pasażerowie po namyśle akceptują to wyjaśnienie. Jednak obsługa naziemna uważa, że ​​jest godzina 21:00 i minęło 6 godzin „Czasu”, ponieważ wskazówki ich zegarków przesunęły się, zaszło słońce i zapadła noc. Załoga trzyma się złudzeń niczym ludzie, gdy Ziemia była płaska, a Ziemia była centrum wszechświata, odrzucając Kolumba i Kopernika na łożu śmierci i paląc Guido na stosie za herezję.

Nie może być „podróży w czasie” bez czasu, a „strzałkę czasu” można równie łatwo odwrócić bez żadnej istotnej różnicy, tzn. „czas” przemieszcza się z przyszłości do przeszłości lub przemieszcza się z przeszłości do przyszłości. Teoretycznie, aby odbyć podróż w „Przeszłość”, wszystkie wektory przyczyny i skutku musiałyby zostać odwrócone, a cofnięcie się o 150 lat zajęłoby 150 lat. Jednakże nie da się tego zrobić. Podróż do „przyszłości” też nie jest możliwa, gdyż wymagałaby zwiększenia pędu wszystkich wektorów pędu, a tego nie da się zrobić.

Co więcej, entropia jest nie tylko błędną koncepcją (tj. jajko było mieszaniną cząstek, zanim zostało starannie złożone w jajko, a następnie wrzucone do chaotycznego bałaganu), ale nie dowodzi istnienia czasu. Stożek świetlny Einsteina, o ile reprezentuje przestrzeń, jest poprawną konstrukcją z fałszywym założeniem, tj. że na górze znajduje się „Czas” w „przyszłości” przechodzący w dół do środka, którym jest „Czas” w „teraźniejszości” ", a następnie niżej, czyli "Czas" w "przeszłości". W rzeczywistości szczyt jest wypełniony wydarzeniami, których pęd nie dotarł do naszej przestrzeni. Środek to nasza przestrzeń sensoryczna, a dół to miejsce, w którym pęd przesunął się z naszej przestrzeni sensorycznej na zewnątrz naszej przestrzeni sensorycznej. Wszystko TERAZ! Możemy opisać cały wszechświat bez złudzeń co do „Czasu” samego w sobie.

Fakt, że światło przemieszcza się szybko, nie dowodzi istnienia czasu

Zamiast stożka świetlnego dokładniejsze jest przedstawienie koła reprezentującego świadomy obszar percepcji zmysłowej. Strzałki na zewnątrz okręgu skierowane do wewnątrz okręgu reprezentują sekwencyjnie oddzielony pęd lub zdarzenia, które nie wpłynęły na twoją percepcję, ale mogą to zrobić. Zobacz, https://www.dreamstime.com/ilustration/arrows-pointing-to-circle-middle.html Strzałki wewnątrz okręgu (lub kuli) skierowane na zewnątrz to zdarzenia lub pęd, które wpływają na twoją percepcję, ale się oddalają. Zobacz, https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/arrows-outwards-circle-round-shape-vector-ilustration-gm1473703846-503768100

Sekwencja nie zależy od „Czasu”, tj. sekwencja 1,2,3 zawsze będzie wynosić 1,2,3 bez względu na to, jak bardzo Ziemia się obróciła lub obróciła. Sekwencja jest niezależna od czasu.

Prawdopodobieństwo, że powyższe subiektywne konstrukty dokładnie odzwierciedlają obiektywne fakty, jest tak wysokie, jak to tylko możliwe.

„Poważne krytyczne myślenie i sceptycyzm wobec nowych, a nawet starych twierdzeń jest nie tylko dopuszczalne, ale jest wspierane i pożądane jako istota nauki”. - Carla Sagana

Odniesienie do stożka świetlnego Einsteina https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone

Szczególna teoria względności Dylatacja „czasu”. 7.2.2 Time dilation, http://www.thestargarden.co.uk/Special-relativity.html

Prawa autorskie © 2024 by David William Jedell E-mail: d.w.jedell@gmail.com

The Best Thought Processes to Recognize Propaganda: Astrophysicist Carl Sagan's "Baloney Test"

By David William Jedell Updated July 15, 2025

Baloney detection kit.

World Renown Scientist and Author of the World's Most Viewed Documentary "Cosmos", Carl Sagan, presents a set of tools for skeptical thinking that he calls the "baloney detection kit." Skeptical thinking consists both of constructing a reasoned argument and recognizing a fallacious or fraudulent one. In order to identify a fallacious argument, Sagan suggests employing such tools as independent confirmation of facts, debate, development of different hypotheses, quantification, the use of Occam's razor, and the possibility of falsification. Sagan's "baloney detection kit" also provides tools for detecting "the most common fallacies of logic and rhetoric", such as argument from authority and statistics of small numbers. Through these tools, Sagan argues the benefits of a critical mind and the self-correcting nature of science can take place.

Carl Sagan advice is pertinent to today's emersion into propaganda:

There must be independent confirmation of the facts given when possible.

Encourage debate on the evidence from all points of view.

Realize that an argument from authority is not always reliable. Sagan supports this by telling us that 'authorities" have made mistakes in the past and they will again in the future.

Consider more than one hypothesis. Sagan adds to this by telling us that we must think of the argument from all angles and think all the ways it can be explained or disproved. The hypothesis that then still hasn't been disproved has a much higher chance of being correct.

Try your best to not purely stick to a hypothesis that is your own and become biased. Sagan tells us to compare our own hypothesis with others to see if we can find reasons to reject our own hypothesis.

Quantify. Sagan tells us that if whatever we are trying to explain has numerical value or quantitative data related to it, then we'll be much more able to compete against other hypotheses. If there is a chain of argument, every link in that chain must be correct.

The use of Occam's razor, which tells us to choose the hypothesis that is simpler and requires the least amount of assumptions.

Ask if a given hypothesis can be falsified. Sagan tells us that if a hypothesis cannot be tested or falsified then it is not worth considering.

Logical fallacies

Ad hominem. An arguer attacks the opposing arguer and not the actual argument.

Argument from authority. Someone expects another to immediately believe that a person of authority or higher knowledge is correct.

Argument from adverse consequences. Someone says that something must be done a certain way or else there will be adverse consequences.

Appeal to ignorance. One argues a claim in that whatever has not been proved false must be true, and vice versa.

Special pleading. An arguer responds to a deeply complex or rhetorical question or statement by, usually, saying "oh you don't understand how so and so works."

Begging the question. An arguer assumes the answer and makes a claim such as, this happened because of that, or, this needs to happen in order for that to happen.

Observational selection. Someone talks about how great something is by explaining all of the positive aspects of it while purposely not mentioning any of the negative aspects.

Statistics of small numbers. Someone argues something by giving the statistics in small numbers, which isn't very reliable.

Misunderstanding of the nature of statistics. Someone misinterprets statistics given to them.

Fallacy of inconsistency. An arguer is very inconsistent in their claims.

Non sequitur. This is Latin for "it doesn't follow." A claim is made that doesn't make much sense, such as "Our nation will prevail because God is great."

Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Latin for "it happened after, so it was caused by." An arguer claims that something happened because of a past event when really it probably didn't.

The excluded middle. An arguer only considers or mentions the two opposite extremes of the conversation and excludes the aspects in between the two extremes.

Examine the Apparently Suspect Propaganda Examples from the Media

Reject the source entirely when you hear or read "What you should know..." or "Experts say..." or "Fact check..." or "Most people believe..." "Polls indicate..." or "Scientists believe such and such MIGHT be true ..." or "Protestors complain about..." or "Doctor gives medical advice (the Dr. is a Ph.d in English literature, ha!) ..." or "The good news is...' or "what you need to know"... or "everything to know about". See, The Press: Equivocal, https://time.com/archive/6766558/the-press-equivocal/

One thing that many people do not realize is that stupidity is independent of intelligence. In other words, a person can be intelligent and very stupid at the same time.

“Stupidity is not a lack of intelligence, but a characteristic.”

https://www.cursor.tue.nl/en/news/2021/oktober/week-2/stupidity-is-a-characteristic-not-a-lack-of-intelligence/

Copyright © 2025 by David William Jedell

Email: d.w.jedell@gmail.com

Det er ugjendrivelig! "Tiden" er alltid nå; Overalt. Beklager Einstein, det er ingen bevis for tid i seg selv; Det er bare et matematisk verktøy for måling av relativ momentum

Av David William Jedell Oppdatert 30. september 2024

"Det er lettere å lure folk enn å overbevise dem om at de har blitt lurt." - Mark Twain.

Hvorfor forblir et så åpenbart konsept uoppdaget siden bevisstheten utviklet seg? Immanuel Kant taklet utilstrekkelig spørsmålet om "Tid", sammen med andre svært kjente filosofer og fysikere. Derfor er det et veldig viktig tema, men verken Kant eller noen andre har sett den enkle sannheten at tid i seg selv ikke eksisterer, selv om de gir sofisterier for å lure sine lesere med innbilte og irrelevante feilaktige tanker. Fakta er som følger: Det er alltid nå. Hvis fysikere, matematikere og andre vitenskapsmenn ville akseptere dette åpenbare faktum, og se bort fra vitenskapelig propaganda og fagfellevurderingen "kravet", ville vi nærmet oss en bedre forståelse av alt. Jeg utfordrer alle til å tilbakevise denne artikkelen.

Vi eksisterer i vår lokale rompunktreferanse (romområde hvor endringer i objekt, energi og bølgeposisjon er innenfor vår bevisste sanseoppfatning). Vrangforestillingen om tidskonstruksjon følger som et resultat av vår enkeltpunktreferanse på jorden, og gir opphav til den bevisste slutningen om fortid, nå og fremtid. Har du noen gang våknet når det ikke var nå? Tikkene på en klokke er bare laget av tannhjul som er koordinert med en brøkdel av jordens rotasjon vi kaller et «sekund». Den holder ikke styr på "Tid". Den holder styr på forholdet mellom to bevegelser. "Hastigheten" til disse bevegelsene er ikke iboende i tiden som en ting i seg selv, men snarere i forholdet mellom avstanden objektet reiser til en vilkårlig brøkdel av jordens sykliske rotasjon som en konstant (dvs. forholdet mellom en til 24, eller en "time"). Space og Now er det samme. Det er bare bevissthet som skaper villfarelsen av tid; uten den ville jorden eksistere i evigheten. Imidlertid ville universet faktisk ikke "eksistere" i det hele tatt uten bevissthet fordi eksistens er strengt tatt en bevisst konstruksjon.

Når det er en hendelse, som en kollisjon av to objekter foran oss, lagrer vi den i minnet. Når den hendelsen har flyttet ut av vårt lokale rom, og det er en annen hendelse i en ordnet sekvens, lurer vi oss selv til å tro at den bevisste oppfatningen av den første sekvensielt ordnede hendelsen skjedde i "fortiden", som et resultat av det faktum at hendelsen genererer ikke lenger sanseimpulser (dvs. du ser den ikke lenger foran deg). Imidlertid fortsetter den hendelsen og dens energier fortsatt i sine effekter i rommet som er ikke-lokalt. Siden vårt bevisste sinn kan gjennomgå oppfatningene av minne og mangelen på de samme umiddelbare sanseoppfatningene som forekommer samtidig (dvs. du ser det ikke lenger), skapes den mentale konstruksjonen at det er en fortid og en nåtid. Dette er ikke saklig, men feil. Når det gjelder "fremtiden", har ikke bevegelsene og tilfeldighetene i "hendelser" (dvs. banene til to objekter som kolliderer) skjedd i vår lokale romreferanse. Fremtiden kan bare forestilles, forutses eller håpes på, men hvis fremtiden fantes, ville den vært i vårt lokale rom. Det er bevegelser av materie og en sensorisk "observatør", men rom er alltid nå og nå er alltid rom. Såkalte "tidsutvidelser" i relativistisk fysikk er i beste fall akselerasjoner av momentum innenfor Nå.

Einstein bruker imidlertid ikke sitt eget postulat om at alle treghetsrammer er likeverdige. Så observatøren på romskipet ser klokken på jorden gå saktere mens observatøren på jorden ser klokken på romskipet gå saktere med nøyaktig samme hastighet. Siden alle treghetsrammer er like, når de to observatørene slås sammen igjen, er antallet klikk på klokkene deres fysisk det samme. Ellers ville observatøren på romskipet se jorden snurre som en topp, og romskipet ville være en "privilegert" referanseramme som Spesiell Relativitet ikke tillater.

Dessuten, i samsvar med Einsteins spesielle relativitet, beveger lys seg alltid i en rett linje. I hans berømte tankeeksperiment forlater lyset senderen og går rett opp mot mottakeren i en vinkel. Dette er umulig. Egentlig må strålen bevege seg rett opp og ned. Det er romskipet som beveger seg, det er alt, og i motsatt retning er den "riktige" rammen også i bevegelse. (Se, 7.2.2 Tidsutvidelse, http://www.thestargarden.co.uk/Special-relativity.html). Klokker er ikke "tiden" i seg selv, men snarere måler og sammenligner de relative bevegelser. Bruken av lys, med sin konstante hastighet i alle referanserammer, for å måle antallet klikk, er ganske enkelt en praktisk måte å nøyaktig sammenligne det såkalte riktige antallet klikk med det relative antallet klikk.

Den bremsende eller røde forskyvningen av lys som beveger seg bort fra et objekt nær hendelseshorisonten til et svart hull (eller mørk nøytronstjerne) er nettopp det; bremsingen av fotoner i grepet om sterk gravitasjon som fortsetter i Space-Now. Det er ingen bevis på at tiden har bremset ned eller til og med eksisterer i seg selv.

En stor hindring for den generelle aksepten av det faktum at tid er en matematisk bekvemmelighet eller verktøy for å sammenligne relative bevegelser i hverdagen, og ikke en ting i seg selv, er at språk, som engelsk, er gjennomsyret av ord som uttrykker tid som en ting i seg selv, slik som «hendte», «var», «i går», i morgen» og mange andre uttrykk for fortid og fremtid. Kalendere, klokker og avtaler er andre hindringer for forståelsen av verdensrommet. en dimensjon til tid er analogt med å tilskrive en 12-tommers linjal og kalle den avstand. På samme måte er ikke klokker selve tiden. Dessuten sier Sapir-Whorf-hypotesen at den grammatiske og verbale strukturen til en persons språk påvirker hvordan. de oppfatter verden. Det understreker at språket enten bestemmer eller påvirker ens tanker. https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2022/05/roe-v-wade-getting-worked-up-over.html

Tankeeksperiment

I stedet for å prøve å tenke ut dette med vårt mangelfulle verbale språksystem, prøv å tenke romlig på hva som faktisk skjer. Her er et enkelt eksempel på romlig forståelse av dette; et tankeeksperiment. Et jetfly plassert på ekvator tar av rett vest. Når den når 35 000 fot, kjører den 1000 mph bakkehastighet. Piloten har kun en solskive foran cockpiten som han kan se fra innsiden. Ingen på flyet har klokke eller klokke. Solskivens skygge indikerer at klokken er 15.00 når den når 35 000 fot. Solen kan sees høyt over. Etter at flyet har reist 6000 miles, står solskiven i samme posisjon klokken 15.00 og solen har ikke beveget seg. Den står fortsatt høyt på himmelen. Piloten og alle på flyet tror at tiden har stoppet under flyturen. De bekrefter til og med denne vurderingen når de lander og bruker noen minutter på å gå inn til flyplassen. Alle klokkene på veggene og alle folkets klokker indikerer 15:05.

På bakken på flyplassen som flyet gikk fra, ser bakkemannskapet på klokkene sine og ser at de indikerer klokken 21.00. Det er også natt, stjernene skinner. De sammenligner minnet om en solrik dag med dagens sanseinntrykk fra natt og ingen sol. De konstruerer vrangforestillingen om tid. Mens piloten og passasjerene har nåværende sensoriske input fra en skinnende sol og en solskive som ikke har beveget seg under flyturen. Til slutt blir piloten og passasjerene informert om at de beveger seg gjennom verdensrommet fra ett område i verdensrommet til et annet, og at de passerte 6 "Etabliserte tidssoner." Piloten og passasjerene aksepterer denne forklaringen etter litt omtanke. Men bakkemannskapet tror at klokken er 21.00 og at 6 timer med "Tid" har gått fordi viserne på klokkene deres beveget seg og solen gikk ned og det er natt. Mannskapet holder på villfarelsen som folk gjorde da jorden var flat og jorden var universets sentrum, og avviste Columbus og Copernicus på dødsleie hans, og brente Guido på bålet for kjetteri.

Det kan ikke være noen "tidsreise" uten tid, og "Tidens pil" kan like gjerne reverseres uten noen reell forskjell, dvs. at "Tid" beveger seg fra fremtiden til fortiden eller beveger seg fra fortid til fremtid. Teoretisk sett, for å reise inn i "fortiden", ville alle årsak- og virkningsvektorer måtte reverseres, og det ville ta 150 år å gå 150 år tilbake. Dette kan imidlertid ikke gjøres. Det kan heller ikke reise til "fremtiden" fordi det vil kreve en økning i momentum av alle momentumvektorer, noe som ikke kan gjøres.

Videre er entropi ikke bare et mangelfullt konsept (dvs. egget var et virvar av partikler før det ble pent satt sammen til et egg, og deretter falt ned i et kaotisk rot), men det beviser ikke eksistensen av tid. Einsteins lyskjegle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone), i den grad den representerer rom, er en korrekt struktur med et falskt premiss, dvs. at det øverst står "Tid" i "fremtiden" " beveger seg ned til sentrum som er "Tid" i "nåtid" og deretter lavere som er "Tid" i "fortid." Faktisk er toppen fylt med hendelser hvis momentum ikke har sekvensert inn i vårt sanserom. Sentrum er vårt sanserom, og bunnen er der momentum har flyttet seg fra vårt sanserom til utenfor vårt sanserom. Alt inne NÅ! Vi kan redegjøre for hele universet uten vrangforestillingen om "Tid" i seg selv.

Det faktum at lyset reiser raskt, beviser ikke eksistensen av tid

I stedet for en lyskjegle, er det mer nøyaktig å avbilde en sirkel som representerer ditt bevisste område av sanseoppfatning. Piler utenfor sirkelen peker innover til sirkelen representerer sekvensielt separert momentum eller hendelser som ikke har påvirket din oppfatning, men som er klar til å gjøre det. Se, https://www.dreamstime.com/illustration/arrows-pointing-to-circle-middle.html Piler inne i sirkelen (eller sfæren) som peker utover er hendelser eller momentum som påvirker oppfatningen din, men som beveger seg bort. Se, https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/arrows-outwards-circle-round-shape-vector-illustration-gm1473703846-503768100

En sekvens er ikke avhengig av "Tid", dvs. sekvensen 1,2,3 vil alltid være 1,2,3 uansett hvor mye jorden har rotert eller rotert. En sekvens er tidsuavhengig. Sannsynligheten for at de ovennevnte subjektive konstruksjonene nøyaktig gjengir objektive fakta er så høy som mulig.

"Seriøs kritisk tenkning og skepsis rettet mot nye og til og med gamle påstander er ikke bare tillatt, det er oppmuntret og ønskelig som essensen av vitenskap." - Carl Sagan

Copyright © 2024 av David William Jedell

E-post: d.w.jedell@gmail.com