By David William Jedell Updated November 1, 2024
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” - Mark Twain.
The Peer Review "Requirement" is Simply a Constraint on Innovative Discoveries Not Understood by the Store-Bought Science Collective in Order to Monopolize True Scientific Thought in the Hands of the Military Industrial Complex
Neuroscience sheds light on brain mechanisms underlying exceptional creativity: A new study sheds light on how highly creative individuals, such as visual artists and scientists, may have brains that function differently compared to others. The research, published in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, reveals that people who exhibit exceptional creativity—referred to as “Big C” creative individuals—demonstrate
more random patterns of connectivity in their brains. By using functional MRI (fMRI) technology, the researchers observed that
highly creative brains bypass typical neural hubs, making distant connections between different regions of the brain more quickly and efficiently. These individuals are not only distinguished by their high levels of creative achievement but also by their ability to think in novel and non-linear ways.
Why does such an obvious concept remain undiscovered since consciousness developed? Immanuel Kant insufficiently tackled the question of "Time", along with other very famous philosphers and physicists. Thus, it is a very important topic, however neither Kant nor anybody else has seen the simple truth that Time in and of itself does not exist, although they provide sophistries to beguile their readers with imagined and irrelevant fallacious thoughts. The facts are as follows:
It is always Now. If physicists, mathematicians and other scientists would accept this obvious fact, and disregard scientific propaganda and the peer review "requirement", we would approach a better understanding of everything.
I challenge anyone to refute this paper.
We exist in our local Space point reference (spacial area where changes in object, energy and wave position are within our conscious sensory perception). The
delusion of Time construct follows as a result of our single point reference on earth, giving rise to the conscious inference of Past, Now and Future. Have you ever woken up when it was not Now? The ticks of a watch are only made by gears that are coordinated with a fraction of the earth's rotation we call a "second." It is not keeping track of "Time."
It is keeping track of the relation of two motions. The "speed" of these motions are not inherent in Time as a thing in and of itself, but rather, in the ratio of the distance the object travels to an arbitrary fraction of the earth's cyclical rotation as a constant (i.e., the ratio of one to 24, or an "hour").
Space and Now are the same thing. It is only consciousness that creates the delusion of Time; without it the Earth would exist in eternity. However, the universe would actually not "exist" at all without consciousness because existence is strictly a conscious construct.
When there is an event, like a collision of two objects in front of us, we store it in memory. When that event has moved out of our local Space, and there is another event in an ordered sequence, we delude ourselves into believing that the conscious perception of the first sequentially ordered event happened in the "past," as a result of the fact that the event is no longer generating sensory impulses (i.e., you no longer see it in front of you). However that event and its energies still continue in their effects in Space that is non-local. Since our conscious mind can review the perceptions of memory and the lack of the same immediate sensory perceptions simultaneously occurring (i.e., you don't see it anymore), the mental construct is created that there is a past and a present. This is not factual but flawed. As far as the "future," the motions and coincidences in "events" (i.e., the paths of two objects colliding) have not occurred in our local Space reference. The future can only be imagined, predicted or hoped for, but if the future did exist, it would be in our local Space. There are motions of matter and a sensory "observer" however
Space is always Now and Now is always Space. So-called "Time Dilations" in relativistic physics are at best accelerations of momentum within Now.
However,
Einstein doesn't apply his own postulate that all inertial frames are equivalent. So, the observer on the spaceship sees the clock on earth going slower while the observer on earth sees the clock on the spaceship going slower at the exact same rate. Since all inertial frames are equal, when the two observers are joined back together, the number of clicks of their clocks are physically the same, and the displacement of each clock from the other is zero. Otherwise, the observer on the space ship would see the earth spinning like a top, and the spaceship would be a "privileged" frame of reference which Special Relativity does not allow.
Moreover, in accordance with Einstein's Special Relativity, light always moves in a straight line. In his famous thought experiment, the light leaves the emitter and heads straight up towards the receiver at an angle. This is impossible. Actually, the beam must be moving straight up and down. It is the spaceship that is moving, that's all, and in the opposite direction, the "proper" frame is also "moving." (See, 7.2.2 Time dilation, http://www.thestargarden.co.uk/Special-relativity.html). Clocks are not "Time" itself, but rather, they measure and compare relative motions.
The use of light, with its constant speed in all reference frames, to measure the rate of clicks, is simply a convenient way to exactly compare the so-called proper frame number of clicks with the relativistic frame number of clicks. Since momentum equals mass timesa velocity, the velocity vector of a photon increases when when the photon also moves with the spaceship. This would make the momentum increase, not "Time.".
The slowing or red shifting of light moving away from an object near the event horizon of a black hole (or dark neutron star) is just that; the slowing of photons in the grasp of strong gravity continuing in Space-Now. There is no evidence of Time slowing down or even existing in and of itself.
A major obstacle to the general acceptance of the fact that
Time is a mathematical convenience or tool to compare relative motions in everyday life, and not a thing in and of itself, is that languages, such as English, are pervaded with words that express Time as a thing in and of itself, such as "happened," "was," "yesterday," tomorrow," and many other expressions of past and future tenses. Calendars, clocks and appointments are other obstacles to the comprehension of Space.
Attributing a dimension to Time is analogous to attributing a dimension to a 12 inch ruler and calling it distance. In the same way
clocks are not time itself. Moreover, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis states that the grammatical and verbal structure of a person’s language influences how they perceive the world. It emphasizes that language either determines or influences one’s thoughts. https://thejedellreport.blogspot.com/2022/05/roe-v-wade-getting-worked-up-over.html
Thought Experiment
Instead of trying to think this out with our flawed verbal language system, try to think in a spacial way of what is actually happening. Here is a simple example of spacial comprehension of this; a thought experiment. A jet liner located on the equator takes off due west. When it reaches 35,000 feet it is traveling 1,000 mph ground speed. The pilot has only a sun dial in front of the cockpit that he can see from inside. Nobody on the plane has a clock or watch. The sun dial shadow indicates it is 3pm upon reaching 35,000 feet. The sun can be seen high above. Subsequent to the plane traveling 6,000 miles, the sun dial is in the same 3pm position and the sun hasn't moved. Its still high in the sky. The pilot and everyone on the plane think that time has stopped during the flight. They even confirm this assessment when they land and take a few minutes to walk into the airport. All the clocks on the walls and all the people's watches indicate 3:05pm.
On the ground at the airport that the plane departed from, the ground crew personnel look at their watches and see that they indicate 9pm. It is also night, the stars are shining. They compare their memory of a sunny day with the present sensory input of night and no sun. They construct the delusion of time. Whereas the pilot and passengers have current sensory input of a shining sun and a sun dial that has not moved during the flight. Finally, the pilot and passengers are informed that they are moving through Space from one area of Space to another, and that they passed 6 "Established Time Zones." The pilot and passengers accept this explanation after some thought. But the ground crew believe that it is 9pm and that 6 hours of "Time" have passed because the hands of their watches moved and the sun set and it is night. The crew holds on to delusion like people did when the earth was flat and the earth was the center of the universe, rejecting Columbus and Copernicus on his death bed, and burning Guido at the stake for heresy.
There can be no "Time Travel" without Time, and the "Arrow of Time" can just as easily be reversed with no real difference, i.e., that "Time" moves from the future to the past or moves from past to future. Theoreticallyt, in order to travel into the "Past", all cause and effect vectors would have to be reversed, and it would take 150 years to go back 150 years. However, this cannot be done. Neither can travelling to the "future" because it would rquire an increase in momentum of all vectors of momentum, which cannot be done.
Furthermore, entropy is not only a flawed concept (i.e., the egg was a jumble of particles before it was neatly assembled into an egg, then dropped into a chaotic mess), but is does not prove the existence of time.
Einstein's light cone (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone), in so far as it represents space, is a correct structure with a false premise, i.e., that at the top is "Time" in the "future" moving down to the center which is "Time" in "the present" then lower which is "Time" in the "past." Actually, the top is filled with events whose momentum has not sequenced into our sensory space. The center is our sensory space, and the bottom is where momentum has moved from our sensory space to outside our sensory space.
All in NOW! We can account for the entire universe without the delusion of "Time" in and of itself.
The Fact That Light Travels Fast Does Not Prove The Existence of Time
Rather than a light cone, it is more accurate to depict a circle representing your conscious area of sensory perception. Arrows outside of the circle pointed inward to the circle represent sequentially separated momentum or events that have not effected your perception but are poised to do so. See, https://www.dreamstime.com/illustration/arrows-pointing-to-circle-middle.html
Arrows inside the circle (or sphere) pointed outward are events or momentum that affect your perception but are moving away. See, https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/arrows-outwards-circle-round-shape-vector-illustration-gm1473703846-503768100
A sequence does not depend on "Time", i.e., the sequence 1,2,3 will always be 1,2,3 no matter how much the earth has rotated or revolved. A sequence is time independent.
The probability of the above subjective constructs accurately depicting objective facts is as high as can be.
"Serious critical thinking and skepticism addressed to new and even old claims is not just permissible, it is encouraged and desirable as the essence of science." - Carl Sagan
Related Material
Ok now children, open to the first page of "See Sally Run." Time's Arrow Within Glass Appears To Go In Both Directions, Raising Huge Questions. Processes within glass, as well as a few other materials with similar properties, appear to be time-reversible, potentially telling us something interesting about the second law of thermodynamics. Just about all physical laws are time reversible, from the Schrödinger equation to Newton’s laws of classical mechanics. Play them back in reverse, and they will look the same either way. But the second law of thermodynamics is different, and shows us an arrow of time. If you see a system heading towards disorder, you can bet your bottom dollar that it is going forward in time. You cannot un-cook an egg.
https://www.iflscience.com/times-arrow-within-glass-appears-to-go-in-both-directions-raising-huge-questions-75551
Time "Arrow" Reversability (Peer Reviewed)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-023-02366-z
Jose N. Pecina-Cruz, Intelligent Systems, Inc., On the Collapse of Neutron Stars. Neutron Stars not Black Holes. This paper reviews the Oppenheimer, Volkoff and Snyder’s claim upon the formation of black holes from the collapse of Neutron Stars. It is found that such collapse is inconsistent with microscopic causality and Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0608121
Profound Brain Changes
https://www.sciencealert.com/profound-brain-changes-of-pregnancy-revealed-in-scientific-first
Does Time Truly Exist or Is It Merely a Human Construct? Time is simply a useful parameter in equations and can be eliminated from all equations without affecting the description of observables. Despite this mathematical proof, many still hold on to the idea of time as a tangible force.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/does-time-truly-exist-or-is-it-merely-a-human-construct.65439/
Copyright © 2024 by David William Jedell
Email: d.w.jedell@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment